Leo Brouwer's Estudios Sencillios!

Welcome to our next Study Group — a collaborative, peer-led dive into a beautiful piece of music over the course of two weeks.

This time, we’re diving into the methodical riches of Brouwer’s Estudios Sencillos 1–10!

This is not a course or a class — it’s a space for mutual exploration, discussion, and shared progress. I’ll be learning the piece alongside you (again — it’s been a while!), and I’m excited to discover new things together.


🗓️ What to expect:
Over the next two weeks, we’ll focus on:

  • 🎯 Fingerings and technique

  • 🎯 Methodical background

  • 🎯 Interpretation and expressive choices

  • 🎯 Your own questions and perspectives!

We’ll also meet for two live Zoom sessions to share progress, chat about challenges, and nerd out over all things Brouwer.


✅ How to participate:

  1. Sign up through the Forum

  2. Grab your score of the Estudios Sencillos

  3. Introduce yourself below!

  4. Join the prompts and discussion

  5. Share your thoughts, ideas, or a clip of your playing


📅 Live Zoom Calls:


🗓️ Dates: July 28th – August 8th


📫 Sign-Up

 

112 replies

null
    • LIVE
    • martin.3
    • 2 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Hey !
    In this video, I take a close look at Estudio No. 1 by Leo Brouwer — the gateway into one of the most iconic etude cycles in modern guitar repertoire.

    I’m using the beautiful edition by Frédéric Zigante (though there are others like the Eschig or Leo's own Espiral Eterna editions). For this video, I focused on just the first study, which already opens up a whole world of right-hand technique and Cuban guitar school methodology.

    🔥 What I cover in the video:

    • The fingering choices I personally use

    • Why I don’t think this piece should be turned into a “play it as fast as possible” challenge

    • How this etude is meant to be accessible — Leo Brouwer himself said he was delighted to see children playing it as intended!

    I’d love to hear:

    • What fingerings do you use for this etude?

    • Did you follow a particular edition, or create your own approach?

    • Any tricky spots where you made deliberate changes?

    Let’s compare notes! Always fun to see how different players approach the same piece 🎶

      • Ron.3
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       I have the Max Eschig editions which I bought only a few years after they were published in 1972. I have always followed the fingerings on the score as they seem to work for me, but I'm open to trying alternatives!

    • Mark_Janka
    • 2 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi, all! I'm new to these studies. I'm going to try out 5.

    • Steve_Price
    • 2 days ago
    • Reported - view

    For #1, I'm curious about interpreting the dynamics? Should they be applied to the melody and accompaniment or just the melody, keeping the accompanying notes at the same level throughout the piece? 

    • BLaflamme
    • 2 days ago
    • Reported - view

    and study group participants, here's a quick take I've done for Estudio #1 (as you can see I wanted to share my computer screen via my soundboard! 😂). I mostly only changed the fingering in the middle part (before the opening part is back), I'm using the one Martin doesn't like (instead of moving parallel 1-3) and I really enjoy how it flows. I'm not playing it as fast as it could be but also not too slow... I'm not really following the indicated dynamics, I'm flowing more with the sound and use some agogic on specific notes to enhance the phrase a bit, and I feel it more fluid and legato than marcato and strong. Let me know your ideas!

      • Retired
      • Andre_Bernier
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Well done Blaise. Bravo

      • Performer, Teacher @Conservatory M. de Falla and member of Nuntempe Ensamble GQ
      • Ariel.1
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

       very nice! I like the articulation you use!

      • BLaflamme
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Thank you Andre, can' wait to hear yours!

      • BLaflamme
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Thank you Ariel, I can see from your FB video that we're using the same fingering for bar 12-13!

      • Performer, Teacher @Conservatory M. de Falla and member of Nuntempe Ensamble GQ
      • Ariel.1
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Yes! I noticed that, too! I think that holding positions letting ring there allows for very rich chord results. When i teach this passage, i often give my students three possible choices: a) You can work the basses as a full melody line with the 6th string basses interacting melodicaly with the 5th string bases, b) you can work with the different strings as separate voicings but rythmically, using articulation to separate them even when thinking of them as a counterpoint or c) you can think of this as a choral, and keep the durations of each bass untill the next one in the same string appears. This three choices invite different fingerings. Ours is the only one that allows for the third choice to play out.  

      • BLaflamme
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Good analysis, my natural choice is always based first on legato, phrase direction, homogeneity of sound and of course no noise (squeaks) 😅

      • Steve_Price
      • 2 days ago
      • Reported - view

        I don't have the best ear to tell, but are you keeping the accompaniment the same while applying the dynamics to the melody only, or applying the dynamics to both the melody and accompaniment? 

      • BLaflamme
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       I keep a different sound for the bass and the top notes (accompaniment) and give different dynamics to each (not at the same time), outlining their own voice direction and trying to make the dialogue a bit clearer. What are your ideas about what to do?

      • Performer, Teacher @Conservatory M. de Falla and member of Nuntempe Ensamble GQ
      • Ariel.1
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       Hi, Steve! Great question! But for the parts that Rene Izquierdo calls "call and response", I think of this as an accompanied melody, so yes, I do try to emphasize the chant's dinamycs by also doing minor inflections in the accompaniment.

      • Ron.3
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       What a lovely performance Blaise - I really enjoyed the clarity and articulation, bravo!

      • BLaflamme
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

      Thank you Ron, I'm glad you enjoyed it and I hope it'll give you some ideas to craft your own version!

    • don.2
    • 2 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Perfect timing! My teacher asked me to learn these. Ive actually never really attempted any of this. I may not join the zoom cos of the timezone but ill definitely be active here. 

    • Player
    • Hancock30
    • Yesterday
    • Reported - view

    I would love to do this. unfortunetly I have had left hand surgery for Duputren's contradtor and a middle "trigger finger ". been only practicing arpeggios for right hand. Thanks for the invite and hope to join later. 

    • Jane_Anderson
    • Yesterday
    • Reported - view

    I look forward to being part of the study group. I've worked on the 10 etudes and am currently focusing on 8, 9, and 10.

    • BLaflamme
    • Yesterday
    • Reported - view

    Hey Tonebuddies, as we're already on day two and the discussion about Estudio #1 seems to slowdown a bit, here's a quick take for Estudio #2 for sharing technical and interpretation ideas! In this one, like the scores says, I think about it as a choral writing and also as voices, I could easily imagine a Gregorian-like chant with men's voices. My main focus is about homogeneity and legato of sound for the upper voices, that act as a block, and a supporting bass, a little further back. Although not yet perfect, to achieve this effect I had to use the technique of "swigging freely" as opposed to planting, an amusing reference in a recent Tonebase reel! 😅Let me know your ideas!

      • Barney
      • 21 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       I enjoyed your interpretation of No. 1 & 2!  The tone, balance, articulation and color are spot on.  Thanks for sharing it!

      • BLaflamme
      • 20 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       Thank you Barney, I hope they'll give you ideas to craft your own version of them, they were quickly prepared and produced for quick sharing, not my usual way of interacting here!

    • Performer, Teacher @Conservatory M. de Falla and member of Nuntempe Ensamble GQ
    • Ariel.1
    • Yesterday
    • Reported - view

    Hi  , and All following this interesting thread! Nice rendering, Blaise! I was following  course and this estudio came up and I, as sometimes happends, diverge a little bit from some fingerings in a sort of interesting way, so i posted a video on the General Discussion part of the forum. You are welcomed to watch it if you are interested (link below) 

    My fingerings were motivated by my desire to keep the basses all the same duration and later on I followed my desire to eliminate the open strings in that GBE chord in the development. 

    I understand how these fingerings may make things a little harder but I am always under the impression that the pieces we have known for a long time are the most fun playgrounds to take chances and fool around a little so that we may find something new and beautiful in between the things that we already know. This Choral, as Rene says, is one of the most beautiful studies. So I'd go to any lengths to make something special of it. 

    I think the basses are a very special sound material (I think of them as bells and hence my right hand goes always to the middle of the string to play them). I think the legato is extremely difficult to achive and deserves a very careful right and left hand synchronization work. What Blaise mentions about not being able to "plant" and prepare the right hand is something to work on too! 

    https://guitar-community.tonebase.co/t/x2yzt02/blasphemous-fingerings-to-mend-brouwers-mistake-in-notation-for-estudio-simple-2

      • BLaflamme
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       (and other participants) An interesting post, and a fun title! My approach to fingerings is always about them to serve the musical idea I have to propose and express, hardly the opposite. You made different choices and they serve well your ideas, kudos for this approach to the musical text. Also, as a side note, I strongly think (my personal point of view) that not planting and «swigging freely» is also skill to develop, for music and sound, for legato and colors.

      • Performer, Teacher @Conservatory M. de Falla and member of Nuntempe Ensamble GQ
      • Ariel.1
      • 22 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       Hi! 

       said:
      My approach to fingerings is always about them to serve the musical idea I have to propose and express, hardly the opposite

      I'm sorry if anything I said gave the impression that I thought differently. I was talking in general, and not at all refering to your version, in particular. Sorry! Your approach is the rule and the correct one, of course!  

      This thing about "free swingging vs. planting"....it's something very interesting and not just related to this Estudio Sencillo, at all. I think I'd like to write a post about this soon to have a place to discuss with all of you further. I see that all Tonebase is a reflection of current world technique development in this aspect and that this has turned in the last 20 years to planting as a major resource for security and virtuosity in the right hand. And certainly "planting" has a lot of "pros". But the "cons" of planting are very seldomly discussed. And there are quite a few. On the contrary, "Free swinging" has it's own complexities but has many pros that have been put a little aside and that we could reconsider. 

      I'll write the post and paste the link asap.  

      • Barney
      • 21 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       Ariel- I agree with your treatment of the bass notes.  It provides a  more complete harmony and nicer sound while maintaining the choral character of the piece.

      Perhaps Leo's fingerings in this case ( #2) were considered more accessible for the beginner guitarist.  Thanks for sharing your alternative fingering.

Content aside

  • 12 Likes
  • 1 min agoLast active
  • 112Replies
  • 333Views
  • 29 Following